Clayton Gilman's latest post discusses a recent case involving a young Canadian couple who sought his intervention with the Ontario Ombudsman. Using a “due care” process, Gilman determined the validity of the complaint -- checking facts and gathering information from other sources. Ultimately he did not intervene, but served primarily as a sounding board for the couple. (Organizational Ombudsman Blog.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment