The latest issue of the Journal of the International Ombudsman Association looks at the fundamental ethical duty of confidentiality. JIOA Editor David Miller says, “the provision of a safe place in which options for action and response can safely be heard, away from the clamour of police sirens and media-fuelled public approbation, can help to protect the individual and public interest by ensuring that matters have a greater likelihood of swift resolution.”
Articles in the current issue of JIOA include:
- “In Whom Can We Trust?” by David Miller
- “Protecting Confidentiality: Considerations for the Ombudsman Subjected to Adverse Publicity or a Subpoena to Testify” by Charles L. Howard
- “Lessons Learned: A Revisit to the Garstang vs. California Institute of Technology Ruling” by Helen Hasenfeld
- “Ombuds in a Cloud of Exabytes — Understanding the Ombuds’ Digital Trail” by Craig B. Mousin
- “Can We Talk? Confidentiality and the Ombudsman as an Individual” by Indumati Sen
- “What Happens to Confidentiality if the Visitor Refuses to Report Unacceptable Behavior?” by Mary Rowe
- “Practice Note: Imminent Risk — A Serious Exception to Confidentiality” by Ilene Butensky
- “An Ombudsman’s Role in the Face of Confidentiality Violations” by Nicholas Diehl
- “Online Dispute Resolution and Ombudsmanship” by Frank Fowlie
- “The Conflict Competent Organization: Assessing the Perceived Economic Value of the Corporate Ombuds Office” by Jason A. Waxman
No comments:
Post a Comment